Explain this "economic stimulus" to me again, please

OK, rant time again:

Topic: The feds current "economic stimulus" package, and it's promise of job creation

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I see most of the USA economy as based upon the consumer. Most of the "private" sector jobs are driven by various purchases, ultimately linked back to the consumer. Sure, health care (hospitals, nurses, etc) and public service (government, police, fire, etc) are not directly tied to a consumers "choice", but most everything else in our economy does fall into that category.

For example, the company that manufactures guitar strings is only as productive as long as there is a consumer purchasing the strings. Then, looking "up stream", the guitar string company only buys the material for the strings, as long as they are selling strings. No sales to the consumer, means no purchases of material for making strings. No consumer purchases, and companies up stream start having to reduce employees due to the reduction in sales. Granted, this isn't the best example, but the idea applies to most industries. If the consumer isn't buying, this impacts all manufacturing industry.

The feds are telling us that they want to throw money at the businesses, in order to create jobs. I'd argue that they are attacking the wrong side of the problem. Creating jobs at a company simply based upon a "cash advance" from the government, doesn't create any additional customers. It simply puts an artificial increase in place, which would promptly deflate once the money is gone. You don't create jobs first, without any customer demand driving the need. And, as far as I can see, many people are having trouble simply keeping their primary needs met (housing, food, heat, etc).

If the feds are going to insist upon throwing our money at the current "economic crisis", I'd propose they first throw money back to us. We are the end consumers, and our purchases will determine where job growth will happen. Sure, it's still a temporary fix, but this approach has a much more direct link to real jobs.

Now some may argue that the feds are trying to make use of the "trickle down economics" concept, by first giving money to the businesses. Their hope is that businesses will then use the money to hire more employees, which will then result in more money in the employees pockets for consumer purchases. The original "trickle down economics" concept was based upon reducing taxes on the business owners, to encourage them to grow their business and reward/hire employees. The idea still was based upon growing the business, which meant finding more customers. Money wasn't directly given to business owners, but their tax burden was reduced. The business owner was encouraged to personally invest more in their business, and thereby create more growth in the business (sales and jobs). That's a different approach, compared to the current fed plan where government is investing.

The other issue is that many businesses are not in a position to simply expand their workforce because they get a government handout. What point is there to increasing production on a line of products that nobody is buying? Granted, the law of "supply and demand" would dictate that this surplus of product would ultimately reduce prices for the consumer, but is that the direction we want to go? If that is the goal, why not just reduce taxes?

My suggestion looks from the direction of businesses driven by consumer purchases. Find ways to get people to start spending money, and that will have a net result of increasing jobs far beyond just giving money to businesses.

Ultimately, these are all temporary solutions, and that's what scares me the most. None of these solutions seem to deal with the true issues at hand. We have a bloated economy and government, which has been running on fictional accounting. Many were not ever expecting a slow down or reduction, and simply always expected increases and growth. However, at some point (which I believe we have reached), you get to a point where the economy can no longer support the expectation of continued growth.

I believe many of these companies need to either go out of business, or reorganize themselves to operate much leaner. With no change in the way things currently operate, a "economic stimulus" will only be a short term patch on the problem (at best).

Much of the world is in a far worse position, and do not have the benefit of a free market capitalist economy. If our leaders would take appropriate action to help reduce the burden on the consumers, we would see our economy bounce back.

The feds only have money they take from us via taxes. If we continue looking to them for help in our economic problems, we are doomed to fail. The citizens have the tools to handle the economy, and the government needs to stop adding more burden to those buying with earned money.

Give the consumer more control of their own money, and the market will determine which businesses survive or fail. Government cannot solve this with tax dollars.

But, we have few too many people who still see the government as a "money machine", and want to look to them for rescue. We need to work harder to educate these folks on where the government really gets their money (from our own pockets).

Oh, and did you notice that the magazine Newsweek has now declared the USA a "socialist" economy. We better hope this isn't actually fact yet, and get that boat turned around ASAP. Newsweek claims we are getting more like France. I'm not sure I see how that's a good thing.

The "baby boomer" generation is starting to reach retirement age, and that's going to increase social security needs, while reducing the existing job force. That means either reducing social security benefits, or increasing taxes on those still working. Although the natural reduction in workforce will help those companies who need to trim workers, it will also create a problem for how the government plans on continuing to fund their social programs. This is a "storm cloud" on the horizon, that I have yet to hear anyone seriously talk about. Watch for it.

Have a nice day!!

Rant mode off.

Life and Death

A couple weeks back, a good friend's mother passed away. The entire family are Christian, and the overall feeling was more celebration than sadness. However, the event still brings up thoughts of our own mortality, and what our purpose is here in this life.

My daily life is spent in an office, generally defined as a cubicle dweller. It's not unusual for this sort of life to generate questions of purpose and contemplastion about impact on the world. The problem arises from needing to generate an income to pay for a lifestyle of some comfort, versus following a more "alive" adventurous life that may not be as financially rewarding.

As a Christian, I have a belief in there being something after our short time on Earth. I believe in the teachings of Jesus, yet have no physical verification of any afterlife. That's the real problem with death - we don't have any physical person to talk to, who has come back from the "other side". Outside of one exception, it's been a one-way path. Faith is all I can stand on, when in this discussion.

Let's say 75 is the average age of death for most humans. The first 20 years (or so) are spent becoming an adult, and growing/learning. Once you are ready for independence, the question becomes what sort of life are you willing or called to pursue. Few seem to appreciate this opportunity early on in their life.

There are many who will spend their entire lives in a basement lab, testing or working with various needs that may be a direct benefit to the rest of us. On the other hand, there are many who will spend their entire lives on a beach, serving drinks and whatever to resort guests. So, which life would be considered more "full"? Both are serving their fellow man, but couldn't it be argued that the beach waiter is getting more engagement with the life we are all given? Isn't the lab tech basically disconnected from the surrounding world?

That's the internal debate I find myself frequently having. I don't see myself directly wasting the life I've been given, but I do question if there is a "better life" I could be living. Then the question becomes, at what point do you stop the "standard" route, and step out into something a bit more engaging.

In recent years, I find myself thinking about how huge our world is. This leads to me concluding what a shame it would be for a person to be born, live, and die all within the same 50 mile radius. We simply have so much more to experience here, and there needs to be more drive to get more engaged in the world around us.

Granted, there are millions who are either physically, financially, or mentally incapable of any dramatic changes. I am not saying they should throw caution to the wind, or put themselves in a harmful situation. On the other hand, maybe there are some small changes they could make to become more active in the world around them.

We all have talents and gifts that are given to us for sharing with others. Most of the time, our "core" talents are things that can be used in numerous locations around the world. There are doctors, lawyers, computer technicians, garbage men, waiters, greeters, and thousands of other jobs available in just about every country in the world. You don't have to stay in one spot your entire life, and probably shouldn't.

To those of you who have already taken some action to expand your life experiences, I applaud you and would ask you to encourage others. Share some your stories, and elaborate on how your experiences brought you to where you are today. Our world has been getting smaller as technology evolves, and it continues to get easier to see more. Get out there and see what the world has to offer you. You may be surprised at what awaits you.

Aren't things supposed to be different now?

**Rant Mode On**

So, we've heard for the last few months about how horrible the George W. Bush presidency has been, and how Barack Obama is going to change all our lives almost immediately.

Last week, Obama was sworn into office (not without some minor issues), and my life is still the same as it was months ago. In fact, there isn't a single thing that has changed as a result of the Obama inauguration. He has had zero impact on my life (so far).

I'm sure the Obama supporters are still promising the world, but they seem to be WAY overselling him. It's almost to the point where it's become idol worship, and Obama will not do any wrong.

Obama has signed some documents starting the shutdown of the Guantanamo Bay prison, thereby releasing many potentially dangerous militant Islamo-Fascists.

I read a story the other day about a musician who had said he felt safer today, now that Obama has signed a order to start working to close Guantanamo Bay prison. I also read another story where the congressman from Pennsylvania said he would welcome the prisoners from Guantanamo into his district (although they only have a minimum security prison in his district).

Now, I'll grant that possibly not every prisoner at Guantanamo Bay is a terrorist, but they also are not randomly picked individuals. They may have been in the wrong place at the wrong time, but that doesn't mean they are completely innocent either.

There are many other countries who are singing the praises of Obama, and saying how much happier they are with him (instead of Bush). Well, need I remind you that this country was built by those who were sick and tired of the rest of the world. Our job has never been to conform to what the rest want, and we certainly aren't interested in pleasing France!!

I sit here and wonder exactly how we are going to be safer, by taking a significantly weaker stance on those who simply want us dead. Terrorists will not be reasoned with, and they have zero regard for innocent civilians. In fact, they use them as primary targets (something the USA avoids). The terrorists will say and do whatever is best to get them closer to their ultimate goal, which would be the complete destruction of the Western Civilization. Obama appears to be opening the door wide open for these radicals. Obama seems to think logic and reasoning will get through to them. I'm not sure he's aware of who he'd dealing with.

Terrorists are known to not have any allegiance to a specific country, and also do not have any ties to a specific government. They operate in the shadows, and they frequently wear masks or coverings. To attempt to use standard military tactics against a cowardly masked guerilla force, simply leads to failure.

Please note, I am not taking any racist stance against a particular color or gender. I also have zero problem with those who have a primary interest of peace, and individual freedom (without harming your fellow man). However, when you base your eternal reward on how many human lives you can take, peace is no longer your true goal.

Our world is not full of terrorists, and our daily lives should not be spent worrying about this. However, we also cannot ignore that there are many out there who have no desire to "negotiate" or be diplomatic.

George W. Bush started his first term with one of the worst attacks on American soil. There were many issues that lead up the accomplishment of that task, not the least of all being a previous administration being soft on terrorism. Bush radically changed direction, and the USA has not seen another similar attack in over 8 years (something most didn't think was possible).

Granted, not every prisoner at Guantanamo will promptly start planning an attack on the USA, but it didn't take many to execute the 9/11 attacks (less than 20).

Do we really want to start randomly releasing terrorists prisoners, simply because liberals think we need to "reason" with them and they will be nice to us? Personally, I'd rather we review each prisoner carefully, before we start sending them away. We also need to make sure they are all on a list and not allowed into the USA for any reason.

My bottom line has always been that I'd rather keep the war off USA soil, and that means it will happen elsewhere. It may not make the rest of the world happy, and that's just fine with me.

** Rant Mode Off **

Ozzy sings Dream Theater

More Guitar Hero amusement.

In the "World Tour" version, there is a "gig" where you play along with some celebrities at a New York City New Year's Eve party in Time's Square. When playing guitar, your band partners include Sting on bass, Travis Barker on drums, and Ozzy on vocals. After you get through the gig (which includes some interesting songs choices - the Metallica tune is nice), you get to the game "end credits". During the credits, you and the rest of the celebrities go through the Dream Theater song "Pull Me Under". I was pretty distracted by watching Ozzy and the others, but kept up on the "easy" level of the song.

I don't remember Sting rocking out quite so hard, and I don't recall Ozzy being able to sing quite as well.

So, today I poked around that found this video of the song from the game. Check it out for yourself, and enjoy:

Guitar Hero WT: Pull Me Under
by Pikatchou9340

Until next time,

Tim

Pro Tools 8 LE installed!!

Well, last night I finally got the upgrade to Pro Tools 8 LE installed.

In general, it went well. There were a couple major missing points in the Digidesign installation directions (like a couple required reboots), but I was going to be surprised if it actually only took less than 5 steps to complete. There was also missing detail in the uninstall routine for version 7.4, but I simply stuck with the basics and got through.

The new look is greatly improved, and certainly has a more modern feel. The black background on the mix view is much better than the previous gray. I like much of what I see, and look forward to getting familiar with the many new updated effect plug-ins.

I will be spending the next couple weeks simply getting my feet "wet" with the new layout and features, before jumping into the writing and pre-production process.

Exciting things to come...

Guitar Hero is EVIL!!!

OK, it may be a bit harsh to say Guitar Hero is evil. But, it is a way to easily lose a couple hours without realizing it.

See, just after Christmas, I got an "on sale" version of "Guitar Hero World Tour" (with the wireless guitar controller), for our Nintendo Wii system. Being a musician myself, I've always found the game a bit frustrating and challenging. The game does build some basic music skills, but overall the songs aren't played quite the same as reality. So, many musicians will stick their nose up at the game, but I thought it would still be something fun to have around the house.

After a couple weeks, I have found that the game can be quite fun, as long as you don't try to force the game to follow you. You need to treat the whole thing as a game, and simply follow what you are told. In that regard, it's almost like the old "Simon" game where you had to repeat exactly what was presented to you. Guitar Hero is basically a game of "follow the leader".

In the game, there is a "career" path that you can follow. This brings up sets of songs that you need to work through, and then you get an "encore" at the completion of the set. You may also get a "challenge" from a celebrity guitar player, like Zakk Wylde or Ted Nugent (these two are in the "World Tour" version).

Me and my wife are both having fun with the game, either with the career path or simply playing single songs. My wife is also getting a kick out of the various characters you can select for playing, and the outfits you can "buy" for them.

Last week, I saw the WalMart had a combo pack of "Guitar Hero 3" and "Guitar Hero: Aerosmith" for $50. These both include different songs from the other "Guitar Hero" games, and the "Aerosmith" edition isn't all just Aerosmith songs (there are other songs included). This combo pack game did not include any guitar controller, but just the game discs. This was fine, since we only have the one controller anyway.

This leaves me with 3 different versions of the games to work through "career" paths. Each "set" can take up to 20-30 minutes to complete, depending upon the number of songs in the set, and encores. This translates into spending at least an hour on these games, and can take more if you are having fun.

One other thing that I didn't expect, was the optical illusion that gets created in the game. For those who don't know, the game is designed around watching a guitar fretboard, and color indicators will scroll by indicating what buttons and "strums" do go with on the guitar controller. These scroll by from top to bottom, like watching the road. Trouble is, after you go back to the screen without the movement, your eyes are still seeing a certain amount of movement in otherwise stationary images. This is kind of odd to experience, but it is just a symptom of watching the moving grid so closely for extended periods of time. There are other "optical illusion" examples on the internet, that can create similar experiences (I remember one where you stared at an image, and then looked at another which would appear to be moving gears, but actually were not).

Between trying to get through the Guitar Hero songs, and the snow this week, I've fallen behind on upgrading my Pro Tools software. I plan on doing the upgrade this weekend, and hope to not spend as much time with the Guitar Hero game. But, the stinking thing is addictive.

And that is why Guitar Hero is EVIL!!!

Studio project Blog - part 1

A month or so back, I promised to start a solo studio project in 2009, and keep a running diary here. Well, here is part 1:

Tonight (January 5, 2009), I'm planning on installing the software upgrade for my Pro Tools LE system. I have the upgrade to version 8, and it involves an uninstall of the previous version. This sort of upgrade is certainly ripe for various troubles, so I'm skeptical about the success. But, I want to get the upgrade completed first, prior to starting any new recording. I got the upgrade a few week back, but a combination of a head/chest cold and the holidays have conspired against me.

So, tonight (or within the next couple days), I will be installing the upgrade.

The next post will be a report on how that install goes.

Tim

NIN - Grand Rapids, MI - Nov 15, 2008

Last Saturday (11/15/2008), my wife and I got to see the latest tour from the band Nine Inch Nails. For those who don't know, Nine Inch Nails is an industrial/metal band headed by Trent Reznor. In the studio, Trent plays all instruments except drums. For the tour, musicians are added to reproduce the sound.

We had last seen the band in 1995, during their "alternative" peak, when smashing instruments and rebellion was the focus of the show.

Trent has traded his angst in for a more artistic representation of his music.

In the past year, Trent has completed his commitments to a record label, and began releasing material independently. This first started with a 2-CD all instrumental disc called "Ghosts", which Trent made available on his website for $10. Then, just a few months later, his made the new release "The Slip" available for free download from the website. Both these releases were given more "typical" distribution to retail outlets, and "The Slip" included bonus material. In both cases, Trent was enjoying his new freedom from the record label, and was rewarding the fans.

For this new tour, Trent brought along some multi-instrumentalist musicians to help cover all the needed sounds from newer more mature material. Guitarist Robin Fink was back, having not been with the band for the past 10 years or so. Bassist Justin Meldal-Johnson (previously with Beck) is now with the band, and also covers some guitar parts during the set. The band is completed with a drummer and keyboard/guitar player. Trent handles vocals, keyboard, guitar, and marimba.

Also, continuing in his drive pioneer new artistic ideas, Trent worked with the company Moment Factory to come up with an interactive multiple LED screen setup. This allowed Trent to create his own visuals "on the fly", while also have numerous standard lighting and strobe effects.

A brief overview of this customized light show can be viewed here:



and here




The set list included music from their entire career, but a majority of the show focused on more recent material. About halfway through the show, the band traded their electronic instruments for a more "acoustic" portion, which included songs from the all-instrumental release "Ghosts". Trent spent most of the section handling the Marimba parts (with an actual marimba), and the band also performed a jazzed up version of their hit "Piggy". Combined with some soft blue lighting, this section was certainly a side of Nine Inch Nails that most are not aware of.

However, the evening was not completely without the energy and angst that made the band famous in the 90s. Early on in the set, "March of The Pigs" was performed with even more energy than it had 14 years ago. Trent certainly had kept himself in shape. If the show had a movie rating, it would definitely fall into the R or NC-17 category.

The 2008 version of Nine Inch Nails is certainly more mature musically. They are no longer just an "industrial" band, but are now experimenting with a variety of styles and combinations. Trent Reznor continues to come up with new ideas for visually representing his band, and isn't content with doing what everyone else has already done.

Whether or not you like the music, the fact is that Trent Reznor continues to pioneer new concepts in music performance, distribution, and visuals. And certainly is enjoying his new found independence.

You can download "The Slip" release for free at http://theslip.nin.com/

Later.

We are the United States - Best Country on the Planet, period.

As a fellow American, I proudly support the democratic process and believe it demonstrated itself in our election. I do not magically believe now that Barack has the right set of ideas, and I believe McCain was much more gracious last night. However, I have always said I don't believe Barack has any malicious intentions and sincerely means to do the best for the country. I simply disagree with how he plans to go about it.


Should Barack prove to be correct and we have much more improvement in the coming years, I will gladly accept that I was wrong and not say otherwise. I also expect the Barack supporters to be ready to "eat it", should the guy fall flat on his face.


Barack wasn't my choice, but he will be my president. And to that, I support him and pray he will be a great president.


Democrats wanted their chance to show they can do a better job than Republicans/Bush. Well, now you've got the chance, so time to stop talking and show us some results.

Official start of solo project

I've been wasting about a year now trying to get myself "up to speed" on a home studio upgrade. The idea is that with a home studio, I would be more productive with getting some original projects completed. I also spent a few extra bucks to get a "virtual drummer" program, in order to more easily facilitate progress.

Now, almost exactly 1 year since getting all the hardware up and running, I've got nothing to show for it. Not quite the plan, is it?

So, I am declaring an "official start date" for embarking upon my solo project, hoping that writing about progress (or lack thereof) will help continue to motivate me. This would also possibly provide a somewhat interesting journal of the process.

The "official start date" will be marked as January 1, 2009. I may start earlier, but this will at least give me a chance to clear outstanding projects off my desk and properly position myself to move forward. Should I start earlier, I will move the date up accordingly.

There is no expected "complete" date, but I would hope to be done within 1 year. I expect this will be a full instrumental project, with smooth jazz tendencies. I expect it to include guest musicians filling the guitar role, and some keyboard work. I also hope to have some guest percussion work, but will most likely end up using more "virtual drummer" for a majority of the drum work.

So, watch for that to kick off in about 8 weeks.

New CD - Brian "Head" Welch - Save Me From Myself

Another CD blog, since there isn't a ton else going on.

I recently picked up the CD from ex-Korn guitarist Brian "Head" Welch. A couple years back, Brian found salvation in Jesus Christ, and became a born-again Christian. He promptly left the band Korn, as he found he could not continue being a part of that particular band.

Earlier this year, an "autobiography" was released titled "Save Me From Myself". With a bit of help, Brian put together his story of drugs, life with the band Korn, and how he found Christ. Two "versions" of the book are available, with a less "graphic" version for those looking to share the story with a younger or more sensitive audience (title of less graphic version is "Washed By Blood"). I have not read the book, but have read reviews saying the story doesn't "sugar coat" any of the realities of the life Brian was "living".

In September, Brian released his first solo music CD, also titled "Save Me From Myself". One can find many similar experiences and themes in the songs, compared with the book.

Musically, it is VERY similar to early era Korn. Production is outstanding, and the music is definitely heavy. If you found yourself enjoying some of what was best of the "nu-metal" style, you would likely enjoy this CD. The creepy dissonant guitars are all over the disc. Brian handles lead vocals, and this is the one point that some have a problem with. Brian is not a great vocalist, and his style isn't anything like Korn's Jonathan Davis. In many ways, the songs may have benefited from a more versatile vocalist. But, this isn't a huge issue. I think it only stands out, because the music is so well done. I especially like the arrangement of the song "Re-Bel", with the children's singing sections. The "chorus" section is provided by Brian's screaming vocals. Musically, this song reminded me quite a bit of the band Rackets & Drapes, and their song "Trick or Treat".

Lyrically, Brian has some good ideas, but I have the feeling it's lacking some spiritual maturity or counsel. His song "Die Religion Die" is attacking the "business" of organized religion, and pleading with the church to unite more and not put so much emphasis on buildings. Not a bad idea, but nothing new really. Songs like "Re-Bel", come from the perspective of Jesus reaching out to the lonely or disconnected. Again, not anything wrong with this, but nothing new. Generally, I find the lyrics simply reflect a "young Christian" as he desires to share his new found faith with the world. Many of the lyrical ideas are fine, but simply not presented in any unique fashion. Almost to the point of being cliche.

There is some controversy surrounding the single "Flush", which addresses Brian's past addiction to drugs (specifically Crystal Meth). The song opens with sounds of vomiting, which can be a bit much for the casual listener. The song directly speaks to his battle with the drugs, and overcoming them with Christ. A video for the song was recently released, which visualizes some of the songs lyrics. In many ways, the video is a bit over done with scenes of vomiting and obsession over a pink powder. Although Brian has directly addressed the concerns with specific references to his own experiences, I'm not entirely sure the visual aspects needed to be so graphic in order to make the point. To me, this is part of his spiritual immaturity, as he seeks to convey his message as best he can. As Brian continues to grow spiritually, I would expect he could find more effective and less controversial ways to convey his message. I do agree with Brian that it is odd to hear about stores removing his CD from their shelves, when the video is not at all included with the CD.

Overall, the CD "Save Me From Myself" is an outstanding nu-metal CD, from one of the pioneers of the style. The lyrical content is boldly Christian, and I have no problem with that. In fact, the lyrics would likely spark good discussions with both Christians and non-Christians.

I'm hoping Brian doesn't take years to complete his next CD, as I'm anxious to hear what's next.

My grade: B

A+ = must have
A = almost perfect
A- = should have
B+ = highly recommended
B = recommended
B- = slightly recommended
C+ = worth checking out if on sale
C = worth checking out if in cut-out bin
C- = worth checking out if at garage sale
D+ = wouldn't want it in my collection
D = wouldn't take it even if it was free
D- = couldn't recommend it to anyone
E = avoid at all costs

A Classic Revisited - Aerosmith "Live Bootleg"

Since I haven't got a ton of things going on, I figured I'd take some blogs to post thoughts on recent CD purchases.

This week: Aerosmith - "Live Bootleg"

For me, this live release captures Aerosmith at their 70s peak. Granted, some of the pleasure comes in reminiscing, since I remember seeing my first Aerosmith concert in 1978. Most of the recordings come from the 1978 era, around the "Draw The Line" tour. Not only do you get the early classics like "Dream On", "Mama Kin", and "Train Kept A Rollin", but you also get later 70s era tunes like "Back In The Saddle" and a cover of The Beatles "Come Together" (which they recorded originally for the movie version of "Sgt Pepper", staring the Bee-Gees and Peter Frampton).

You wouldn't get any argument that this wasn't the "tightest" version of Aerosmith, since this was back before everyone completed their first detox tours. In my opinion, this is Aerosmith at their best. Bluesy hard rock, played just a bit sloppy, but with tons of attitude.

Originally released as a 2-LP project, I remember not being able to get a copy because it was too expensive ($9). Now, we get most everything on a single CD (around $11.99), and the remastering does add some punch to the live mix. The new booklet features all the photos and notes from the original LP set, as well as some previously unreleased photos. Overall, it's a nice package for the classic rocker.

If you are looking for the more recent "soundtrack ballad" Aerosmith, you won't find it here. But, if you want to hear want built this band into a classic rock staple with millions in unit sales, here's a snapshot of the energy. I only wish there was a decent video of this era Aerosmith, so we could see some of these performances as they happened.

It's not perfect, but that wasn't the point. They didn't call it "live bootleg" for nothing.

My grade: A-

A+ = must have
A = should have
A- = highly recommended
B+ = recommended
B- = slightly recommended
C+ = worth checking out if on sale
C = worth checking out if in cut-out bin
C- = worth checking out if at garage sale
D+ = wouldn't want it in my collection
D = wouldn't take it even if it was free
D- = couldn't recommend it to anyone
E = avoid at all costs

I'm not racist...but I will have an opinion

It would seem that the only reason some believe I'm voting for McCain, is because I'm racist - at least, that's what they end up concluding. I'm getting tired of hearing these "thinking people" resort to name calling, in order to support their agenda that any "thinking person" cannot possibly support McCain. Well, I'm here to burst their bubble.

You see, I personally have no problem with race, and it plays no part in my choice for president or even friendships. I do have a problem with poor choices and bad judgment (regardless of race), and will not support either. Trouble is, just because I personally disagree and will not support someone due to their own choices, does not mean I have any problem with their skin color. You can be white, black, brown, yellow, whatever, and it has no bearing on whether I would consider you someone I would respect. It has everything to do with how you behave and present yourself, as well as whether you are respectful of others. A white person that is full of tattoos and body piercings may be a genius at rocket science, but their choices of "personal expression" will cause me to seriously consider their judgment. It has nothing to do with race. Similarly, the black or white or yellow man who wears his pants down around his knees may be a genius at economics or law. But, their choices of "personal expression" will again cause me to seriously consider their judgment. It has nothing to do with race. On the flip side, I could see a person well dressed and groomed who presents themselves well, could be a complete moron on just about every topic. I would be less likely to question their judgment, as they are not overtly displaying their own "personal expression". It has nothing to do with race.

The point is that I have no problem with Obama's race. I've got tons of problems with his lack of experience, and complete ignorance on how to fund his great plans for the USA. Not to mention, that ALL of his ideas would need congressional approval, and we know how productive those folks are (NOT!!). Obama may have grand ideas, but he seems to leave out how to accomplish them effectively.

I'm not without reservation regarding McCain, but the guy has decades more experience with regards to actually running the country. He's not the best choice, but he sure beats the pants off of an Obama presidency. At least McCain seems to understand that it's not all up to him to solve all the problems in the country, nor will he take that responsiblity. He understands the job involves leadership, and not just pandering.

It has nothing do to with race. It has everything to do with experience, judgment, and an understanding of what makes the USA great.

It's the individual citizens, and not the politicians!! Stop putting so much faith in the politicians, and start putting faith in ourselves!! It has nothing to do with race.

Motorhead 2008 - The Orbit Room, Grand Rapids

Motorhead 2008 - Review of September 13, 2008 concert at The Orbit Room in Grand Rapids, Michigan

It's been almost 15 years since I last saw Motorhead in concert, and this was my wife's first time.

I have to first off start with a few comments about The Orbit Room. This venue has the potential of being a very cool club type concert hall, but has not been well maintained. What was once a very trendy looking place has now become a little bit better than your typical bar. On many recent occasions, they were not allowing access to the upper balcony, which further frustrates old people like me. For this show, we were able to get upstairs, however the track up via the first staircase proved adventurous, due to hardly any lighting. Once up at the balcony, getting around was also tricky, due to very limited stair lighting (I tripped more than once). The Orbit room used to have waitresses wandering around taking drink orders, but that has been discontinued (unfortunate). Overall, it wasn't our worst experience at The Orbit Room, but they could do much to improve things.

We arrived shortly after the second band had started. They were called "Year Long Disaster". They seemed to be more of a rootsy hard rock, akin to maybe Aerosmith or Led Zeppelin. Sort of a dirty bluesy rock, from this three-piece. Not bad, but I'm not buying yet. Next up with a group known as "Valient Thorr". These guys are full of energy, and appear to be bent on winning the audience over. With music that sounded like AC/DC on speed, this group was non-stop hard rock at 150bpm. Add to this the overall abundance of band facial hair, and you've got an odd visual. The lead singer "Valient himself" was constantly moving, jumping, climbing on speakers, dancing around, and attempting to engage the audience. Overall, the style isn't my cup of tea, but I'll give them a "A" for effort. They are apparently building a name for themselves by getting songs onto video game soundtracks.

Finally we get the headliner - the mighty Motorhead. After over 30 years of making music, Lemmy Kilmister and company still manage to maintain a trademark sound that doesn't much change. For the fans, this is a good thing. Basic high speed rock-n-roll with vocals that sound like they came from an 80yr old smoker (Lemmy is around 60 now, isn't he?). By introducing themselves as "we are Motorhead, and we play rock and roll", the band kicked into over 90 minutes of tunes from across their entire career. New material sounded like it came from the original 1980 "Ace of Spades" era, while cover tunes like Thin Lizzy's "Rosalie" still had that Motorhead stamp on them. The only "odd" moment was their first encore of an acoustic guitar blues tune, with Lemmy just handling vocals. Other than that, I'd say the night was loud, fast, and exactly what everyone wanted. After pummeling the audience with their sonic onslaught, they left us with ears rining, and some bass guitar feedback that only Lemmy provides. You gotta love a band that hasn't given up their style or compromised their image (warts and all).

The previous time I had seen Motorhead (again, 15 yrs ago), they were opening for Black Sabbath. Motorhead got about 45 minutes, and they wasted no time with their attack. I was surprised at how the band has very little stage "antics", and that hasn't changed over the years. Motorhead has no special gimic or show, but simply comes out loud and fast.

I don't know how much longer Motorhead will be around, but I'm betting Lemmy has at least another 10 years worth of damage to cause. See you next time around.

Part of why Obama is a problem for the USA

Talking politics:

I'm not exactly excited over either candidate (McCain or Obama), but Obama is definitely NOT the person to put in charge of the country. His plans are based off of monies that the government doesn't have (yet), and the plan is to raise taxes on the "wealthy" and "businesses". So, I suppose you'll be fine as long as:
- You don't own a business
- You have no desire to become wealthy yourself
- You don't work for a business
- You don't get a paycheck from a business
- You don't work for someone who is currently wealthy and owns a business
The problem with Obama's plan is that it puts a tax burden on those who have been successful, thereby discouraging success. If I happen to be lucky enough to start up a successful company from scratch, and now the government is going to take more of my money and hand it over to those "more in need", it won't take long before I decide to close up shop. That has the additional problem of removing tax revenue from the federal government, thus forcing tax increases on the rest of us to "fund" those helpful programs that Obama wants. Not a good plan.

On the other hand, additional tax breaks and reductions on businesses will reward the successful and increase jobs (economics 101). This allows more jobs, more pay increases, and obviously more money spent.

The biggest problem is that many seem to see the government programs as "free" money or services. Trouble is, that is NOT the case. Us tax paying workers are funding this government and it's programs. Regardless of how Obama wants to "spin" it, national healthcare, educational subsidies, and other hand-outs are going to be funded by tax payers. The level of spending that Obama has in mind will obviously result in more tax increases than just the "wealthy" and "businesses". It's going to cost all of us.

Obama simply doesn't understand what has made the USA the best nation in the world to live in, and continues to be the place where most of the world would rather be. McCain may not be the best choice, but he does have more understanding than Obama.

Get over your "celebrity admiration" of Obama, and give reasonable thought to what really makes our country great. Obama is more of a politician than he is a leader.

In the USA, you should be allowed to be successful without punishment ("pursuit of happiness" and all that). If that's taken away, what's left to motivate the inventor and pioneer?

Cool Electronic Instrument - ReacTable

Just thought I'd pass this video along, for your enjoyment. This is a unique new electronic instrument called a ReacTable, which I've seen in live performance by the band that backed up singer Bjork. At the concert, I was never able to figure out what this thing was doing. Pretty interesting, if nothing else.

Well, Palm Centro SmartPhone wins

After spending a couple months reviewing various "smartphone" options and plans with AT&T (our current wireless provider), I had just about decided to not make any move. However, this past weekend my current cellphone "smartcard" decides to die. Not knowing exactly what the problem was, I take this as a sign that it's time to make a move. So, off to the AT&T store to talk about various options. After some more serious consideration and review, I opt for upgrading both mine and my wife's cell phones to the Palm Centro.

Why the Palm Centro instead of an iPhone? Well, the biggest reason has to do with the fact that both me and my wife have been using Palm PDA devices for the past few years. So, we were both familiar with the Palm operating system, and it's features. Combining that function with the cellphone, means we are able to consolidate two devices into one (that's a good thing). After mail-in rebates, the Centro price was $69 each. Not so bad for our first "smartphone" experience. The Palm Centro features "bluetooth" capability that supports data transfer (which isn't on the iPhone), photo and video function (iPhone doesn't support video - yet), full QWERTY keyboard (although pretty small), and internet browsing capability (via Palm's "blazer" browser). There are some other minor functions. I am able to add up to 4GB in additional memory via MicroSD card. The unit does not have Wi-Fi like the iPhone, but I'm not looking for this to be my primary internet access device. Although I can appreciate many of the functions of the iPhone, the bottom line was that the Palm device fit my needs more appropriately. There is also the idea that this is our first move into "SmartPhone", so we already have more features than we know what to do with.

As with most any plan from AT&T, the extra data piece (unlimited use) is an extra $30 a month per phone. This is not the most economical option out there, but does fit conveniently with our existing "family" plan. This DOES NOT include "texting", however there is various "instant message" options available on the Centro and that works as "data use". So, that fills that need, if we decide to use it.

The one issue that I'm seeing is with most "smartphone" options is that battery life is greatly reduced when using the "advanced" functions. Things like activating the "bluetooth" functions, activating the "instant message" accounts, or any other option that keeps the phone "awake", all is a drain on the battery. If you are able to keep these features turned "off", you will see the Centro go into "standby" mode and that doesn't eat up nearly as much battery. I had read that the Centro had about half the battery life as an iPhone, so I'm not entirely caught off guard with this. On the plus side, the Centro has an easily replaced battery, while the iPhone requires you to send it back to the factory for battery replacement. While this may not be an immediate concern to the common consumer, it is something that should be given consideration.

Overall, I'd say the Palm Centro on the AT&T network is the best "value" for the consumer looking to move into the "smartphone" arena. It's certainly not as "cool" as the iPhone, but does have some key features not supported in iPhone. Neither is perfect, so review your needs and go with what best fits your lifestyle.

Some Concert Reviews from last week

As mentioned previously, I was at some concerts over the past week, and I thought I'd share some thoughts on them.

Los Lobos and Los Lonely Boys at Meijer Gardens (Aug 7):













My first surprise of the evening was the Los Lobos was opening the show. Considering their almost legendary status, I wasn't expecting them to start things off. But, these road veterans wasted no time getting their Tex-Mex sound going. Los Lobos has a nice combination of roots/blues rock with a decent amount of traditional Mexican flavor added to the sound. The 1hr 15 minute set went by quickly, and yet seemed just about the right amount for what the crowd wanted. Next up was the currently popular and Grammy nominated (didn't they win?) trio from Texas. Combining rock and blues, this group of brothers reminded me of both Stevie Ray Vaughn and ZZ Top, with the added bonus of some outstanding vocal harmonies. The guitarist was able to cover quite a bit of musical ground, showing influences from all the greats of the past, while still adding some of his own identity. Bassist for the group was amazingly subtle with the amount of foundation he provided in the music. The casual listener wouldn't have noticed that it frequently sounded like more than just one guy playing behind the guitar solos. The drummer was solid as could be, and frequently added a third vocal harmony. He was another understated performer, but the talent was unmistakable. Overall, both bands were outstanding and neither seemed to overshadow the other. In fact, towards the end of the Los Lonely Boys set, they brought out members of Los Lobos for a few songs of fun and jamming. Either band is worth catching, but both on a single night was something special.

"Legends" sets at Unity Fest in Muskegon:

















On Saturday afternoon (Aug 9), Unity Fest brought together 3 of the legends of Christian "rock"/"contemporary" music. First up was Randy Stonehill. Having started back in the 70s, Randy still knows how to entertain a crowd with just his voice and a guitar. Randy brought no fancy gear or backing musicians, but gave the crowd a great sampling of his past and present. Including songs he wrote with Keith Green, and up to a new yet-to-be-released song, he shared for about 45 minutes. Next up was Phil Keaggy. Phil is amazing on guitar, and this was similar to Randy (just Phil and a guitar). Phil did make use of his "looping" pedals, and created many great soundscapes that need to be heard to be believed. Phil's voice was in fine form as well. He shared songs from all across his long career, including some new material (written as recently as a week before the show). Last was a reunion show from Resurrection Band. This was the last reunion show scheduled for the band, so there was quite a bit of interest in how this would go. The band concentrated mostly on their early material, rarely getting into anything beyond 1985. Wendi Kaiser sounded great on vocals, and Stu Heiss was doing some great lead guitar work. In general, the band wasn't as tight as I had hoped, but it could have been worse. Overall, I would say all 3 gave the crowd an education in the foundation of Christian "rock". It was a unique chance to see all 3 in a single afternoon.

That is all for now.

"Major Labels" and their stupidity

In the music industry today, there are what is called "major labels". These are typically the big corporate labels that put huge dollars behind million-selling artists. Labels like Sony BMG, Warner Music, EMI, and Universal. These are also the same guys who are complaining about the digital music revolution (iTunes and the like), while continuing to overcharge for audio CDs (in most cases).

The labels are continuing to put their money behind a 25 yr old technology (audio CDs), and haven't been able to find a new technology that appeals to the masses. To casual music consumers, a typical audio CD has been more than satisfactory. The recent popularity of the iPod and other MP3 devices has only proved the the public is looking for more convenience, rather than increased quality. If the music sounds very similar to an audio CD and I can put my entire catalog of CDs onto a unit that fits in my pocket, that is proving to be something I'm willing to invest in. In other words, the major labels haven't been the best at chasing new technologies, and are now upset that the public is finding alternatives.

When your favorite band puts out a new CD, you typically will run to your local retailer and pick up the copy. Sometimes it will be on sale, as part of a new release promotion. But, you don't mind paying $10-$15 to help support your favorite band. You also help the band by getting them better initial sales results (possible chart position). You get to hear the new music, the band gets sales on the new CD, and the label sees some profits. A year or two later, your favorite band releases a CD of all new music, and the cycle repeats itself.

Lately, I've been seeing a new "trend" which further proves the major labels have only "money" as their driving force. A band will release a CD today, and start a tour to support it. If they happen to get some momentum behind the CD and it becomes popular, labels are now "re-releasing" these popular CDs (sometimes within 12 months of original release) as "expanded" versions. Basically, the fan who originally went out and bought the bands CD, now has to buy the whole thing over again to get a select few new tracks. Not only does this effectively penalize the consumer for buying the initial release, but it also tends to delay the release of an entirely new CD.

An example is the recent news of the debut CD from "Daughtry" (released Nov 2006)now being re-released with 3 newly added "acoustic" versions of songs from the CD (releasing Sept 9, 2008). A "bonus" DVD is also being included in the new "expanded" version. If you've already bought the original, are you going to buy again for just a few new add-ons? If you haven't bought the original, will this motivate you?

Rather than releasing an "expanded" version of the initial CD, why not go with the idea of a new "EP" (shorter format) CD with DVD, and put the new material out as a new product? Simply repackaging the original with some "extra" material seems to be a slap in the face to the existing fan base who has supported the original release.

This isn't the first time a label has done this sort of thing. The current popularity of "remastered" versions of CDs has provided labels with a new way to get a consumer to re-buy their favorite CD, in hopes of getting some enhanced product. In many cases, some additional "previously unreleased bonus" tracks are added to help the value. However, in the case of the "Daughtry" CD, we aren't even talking about remastering. This is purely slapping a few "bonus" tracks onto a popular release, and trying to milk a few more dollars. Not exactly the best way to keep the fans happy.

How many times have you repurchased a release? Did you originally buy something on vinyl record, then cassette, and now CD? Would you be willing to buy an "expanded" version of a CD you bought within the last 24 months, if they added the bonus DVD and a few songs?

Concerts this week

So, after a bit of a lull in concert attending, this week we have two on the schedule:

Tonight (Aug 7) - Meijer Gardens (here in Grand Rapids) is having a great double bill show. The evening will start with the Blues/Rock sounds of Los Lonely Boys (great trio), followed by the road veterans Los Lobos. Los Lobos has been around for decades, and have reached almost legendary status. Los Lonely Boys came to national attention a few years back with their hit "Heaven", and are known for their great live shows. Should be a night of some outstanding music, with a Tex/Mex flavor.

Saturday (Aug 9) - We are going up to UnityFest in Muskegon (www.unitymusicfestival.com) on Saturday, as they are hosting a "legends" package in the afternoon. Starting off at 2:30, Randy Stonehill will perform a solo acoustic set. Phil Keaggy will follow at 3:30 with a similar set. Then a reunited Resurrection Band will perform a set starting at 4:45pm. Considering this is the second of only 2 reunion shows for Resurrection Band, this is a "must see" for me. Reports from their first show last month at Cornerstone Festival were very positive, so expectations are high.

Other shows of note coming in the next month:

• Friday (Aug 8) - Although we aren't going on Friday, Unity Fest (www.unitymusicfestival.com) is having headliners Skillet and Toby Mac both on Friday night. That's a good combo, if you ask me, but I can't make it.

• August 23 - Bill Haley's Comets, Hastings SummerFest, Downtown Hastings - Afternoon outdoor performance - Although this no longer includes Bill Haley (who passed away in 1981), the group reportedly is now led by "original" bass player Al Rappa.

• September 23 - Monte Montgomery, The Intersection (front lounge), Grand Rapids - www.sectionlive.com - Rumor has it that local favorite Ed Englerth may be opening the show (just rumor at this point)

• October 2 - Jon Olivas Pain and Circle II Circle, The Intersection, Grand Rapids - www.sectionlive.com - Jon Oliva is one of the main composers behind Trans-Siberian Orchestra, but is more known as a founding member of the band Savatage. Circle II Circle is a band founded by a previous lead vocalist for Savatage. This is a rare opportunity to see both bands on stage in one evening, and may see a mini-reunion for some Savatage tunes. Should be a good night.

That is all for now.